Why do men always, always fall into one of the following categories??
I mean, cummon lah. It's frustrating to know that if men are exciting, interesting and single, they're usually as corrupted as my very-dead, lost-by-now, 2005, 60GB HDD. (Think: Bad Boy Ben.) On the other hand, if they're single and uncorrupted, they're usually as dull and boring as hospital food. (Think: Dull Dillon.) And if they're neither (read: relatively interesting and relatively uncorrupted – I mean, who's 100% interesting and a guaranteed 100% uncorrupted nowadays, anyways?), they're always attached. (That's Taken Timmy for you.)
A) ...for Attached
B) ...for Boring
C) ...for Corrupt
I mean, cummon lah. It's frustrating to know that if men are exciting, interesting and single, they're usually as corrupted as my very-dead, lost-by-now, 2005, 60GB HDD. (Think: Bad Boy Ben.) On the other hand, if they're single and uncorrupted, they're usually as dull and boring as hospital food. (Think: Dull Dillon.) And if they're neither (read: relatively interesting and relatively uncorrupted – I mean, who's 100% interesting and a guaranteed 100% uncorrupted nowadays, anyways?), they're always attached. (That's Taken Timmy for you.)
Sigh.
Shit liao lah.
Shit liao lah.












